Daily Archives: October 29, 2021

SAO13 Logo

Michael Hector, Jr. Use of Deadly Force Review

Following an extensive review, our office has concluded that we cannot refute the anticipated assertions by two male victims, “Victim 1” and “Victim 2,” that they acted in lawful self-defense in the use of deadly force against 24-year-old Michael Hector, Jr. on November 26, 2019. Our review determined that the evidence shows Hector and an associate drove to Plant City with the intent to commit an armed robbery on Victim 1 at his home. Hector and an associate approached the victims while they were sitting in a car in front of Victim 1’s home. A witness saw Hector point a gun at Victim 1, who was in the driver’s seat. The same witness heard an “argument” and then saw Victim 2 fire on Hector, who began to retreat and return fire. Hector was struck six times by projectiles from two different firearms and did not survive. Hector was killed while in the commission of an attempted robbery with a firearm of Victim 1. Our review determined that the evidence is consistent with the victims acting in self-defense. In reaching this conclusion, our office conducted an exhaustive review of all available evidence and applicable legal standards. These steps included but were not limited to:

  • reviewing interviews of witnesses
  • examining physical evidence
  • reviewing video evidence
  • reviewing photographic evidence
  • reviewing 911 calls, radio communications, and relevant audio
  • analyzing autopsy results
  • reviewing cellular phone records and data
  • applying the applicable laws

The Plant City Police Department conducted the investigation. Investigators found that Hector and an associate traveled from Winter Haven to Plant City on the evening of November 26, 2019, with the intent to rob Victim 1 at gunpoint. When Hector and his associate arrived at Victim 1’s home, they were seen in the backyard by a witness. Later, Hector was seen approaching the driver’s side door of a red car, where the victims were seated, and pointing a firearm at Victim 1. Victim 2 then shot at Hector from the vehicle. Hector tried to run away, while shooting back at the victims in the car. The associate of Hector stated, under oath, that the victims both shot at Hector while Hector was shooting back. Shell casings at the scene indicate that a total of three firearms were fired during the incident. Multiple witnesses saw the victims flee the scene in a red car immediately after the shooting

The Hillsborough Medical Examiner’s Office concluded that Hector was shot six times, with two of the gunshot wounds being fatal. Hector suffered six separate projectile injuries with eleven total wounds (entry and exit). The medical examiner was unable to determine the caliber of the projectiles that struck Hector, but due to only five 9mm rounds being fired at Hector, and Hector being shot a total of six times, Plant City Police concluded that three different firearms were used by the three people involved in the incident: two 9mm handguns and one .40 handgun.

Cellular tower records indicate Victim 1 was in the area at the time of the shooting and fled the area immediately as 911 calls were coming in. Cellular phone records also support a witness’s statement that Hector called him earlier that day and asked him to participate in a robbery in Plant City. Multiple neighbors heard multiple gunshots and saw a red car driving away immediately afterward. One witness observed two men in the backyard of Victim 1’s home before the shooting, and later saw them approach the red car. Another witness indicated they heard an “argument” at the driver’s side of the red car immediately before the shooting started. An eyewitness indicated she observed the two victims and another unknown man standing in the front yard of Victim 1’s home 30 minutes before the shooting. She was outside her home when she heard an argument and gunshots. She observed Hector running from the front yard of Victim 1’s home. Hector was running and shooting back toward the home while other people shot at him. As soon as Hector fell from being shot, she immediately observed the victims drive away in a red car.

An associate of Hector indicated that on November 26, 2019, Hector said he wanted to rob Victim 1 due to him flashing money on social media and selling drugs. He drove Hector to Victim 1’s home. Hector went in the back yard of the home first but he was confronted by a man in the yard and left. The associate then parked north of the home and observed a red car pull up to the house. The red car was occupied by Victim 1 (driver) and Victim 2 (front passenger). Hector was armed with a handgun and pointed it at the victims in an attempt to rob them. He observed Victim 2 shoot Hector from the passenger seat. Hector then ran away from the red car while pointing a gun at the victims and shooting back. The victims got out of the red car and began firing multiple rounds at Hector until he fell in the street. After Hector fell, the victims got back into the red car and fled the scene. Then man got into a silver vehicle, drove up to Hector’s body, and took unknown items from him. The associate believes the unknown person took the gun Hector had used, as well as Hector’s cell phone.

The victim’s names are being withheld due to Marsy’s Law.

After our thorough analysis, we have determined that the facts and evidence cannot refute the potential claim by the victims that they reasonably believed they were in fear of imminent death or great bodily harm when they used deadly force. These findings satisfy Florida Statute 776.012. Accordingly, under Florida law, there is no legal basis for criminal charges against the victims.

An initial release of materials related to this case is available at this link. These items illustrate the crime scene and key details of the case. Further documents related to the case, including additional photos, reports, and interview transcripts, are available to any member of the public subject to Florida’s Public Records Law; find details on making a request on the State Attorney’s Office Public Records page.

SAO13 Logo

Mike Munoz Use of Deadly Force Review

Following an extensive review, our office has concluded that we cannot refute the assertion by a 29-year-old male victim that on February 7, 2021, he acted in lawful self-defense in the use of deadly force against 25-year-old Mike Munoz. Our review determined that the evidence is consistent with the victim’s assertion that as he attempted to leave a party, he and his girlfriend were attacked, and a fight broke out. The host of the party discharged a firearm, and the victim fired back. During this exchange of gunfire, Munoz was shot and killed.

In reaching this conclusion, our office conducted an exhaustive review of all available evidence and applicable legal standards. These steps included but were not limited to:

  • reviewing interviews of witnesses
  • examining physical evidence
  • reviewing video evidence
  • reviewing body worn camera evidence
  • reviewing photographic evidence
  • reviewing 911 calls, radio communications, and relevant audio
  • analyzing autopsy results
  • applying the applicable laws

The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office conducted the investigation, and a representative from the State Attorney’s Office worked closely with detectives in the investigation of this case. Investigators found that the victim and Munoz attended a party in Plant City. At some point, there was an altercation between the victim and other people at the party. The victim was asked to leave. The victim was leaving when multiple people converged on him, with individuals throwing a beer bottle at him, pulling him out of the vehicle, and punching him. A fight broke out.

According to witness accounts, the host of the party pulled out a gun and fired it toward the victim, and the victim fired back with his own gun. During this exchange of gunfire, Mike Munoz was shot and killed. A witness heard someone yell, “Mike, get the AR!” No AR-style semi-automatic rifle was found at the scene. However, three spent 9mm shell casings were found on the ground near the driver’s side of the black Nissan where Mike Munoz had been standing. A total of 15 shell casings were found at the scene, and at least four firearms were discharged during this incident. The victim and his girlfriend had been beaten to the extent that they would later be treated at a local hospital.

The host of the party claims he got his gun and fired it into the ground. However, a witness claims the host of the party shot his gun in the direction of the victim. Projectiles were not found in the ground at the location where the host claimed to have fired shots.

The Hillsborough Medical Examiner’s Office performed an autopsy and determined the cause of death to be gunshot wounds to the abdomen with perforations of the aorta, colon, and mesentery. Munoz had a total of five gunshot wounds, including three entrance wounds on the front of his body. The entrance wounds were on the right side of his abdomen, the left side of his abdomen, and on his right thigh. Munoz had two exit wounds on his lower left back area. The manner of death was ruled a homicide.

The name of the victim is being withheld due to Marsy’s Law.

After our thorough analysis, we have determined that the facts and evidence cannot refute the statements by the victim that he reasonably believed he was in fear of imminent death or great bodily harm when he used deadly force. These findings satisfy Florida Statute 776.012. Accordingly, under Florida law, there is no legal basis for criminal charges against the victim.

An initial release of materials related to this case is available at this link. These items illustrate the crime scene and key details of the case. Further documents related to the case, including additional photos, reports, and interview transcripts, are available to any member of the public subject to Florida’s Public Records Law; find details on making a request on the State Attorney’s Office Public Records page.

Join our E-Newsletter using the form below:


Translate »